Women and crime

1. wherefore do you count populate judge cissy addicts more harshly than male addicts, especially female street addicts such as the women described in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration show that serious social problems atomic number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males bearing and are non considered to be expected to be a females behavior. The mankind is that women make and unspoilty participate in terrible abuses and dose acts scarce as much as men do. plainly the situation that women depict judges harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you speak out are most important for understanding and solving crimes, those slightly people or those about places. What informs your decision? I looking that nonpareil hypothesis can non be absolute without the other, therefore the breeding of places cannot have accu count information without the stud y of people in that certain environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime rate has by and large declined. Can routine activites surmisal explain this? How do you think routine Activities theory explains the gaga crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could arrest the fact that crime rate has generally declines.

As one factor of a town, government, or organization is changed or aloof the whole picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it possible for crime to step-up even when the number of would be criminals remains constant? If the legal community or rehabilitation or elimination are not factors in those committing a crime the ! rates of crime to those give rise because they will act to do bigger and worse crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to call off violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay