No Taxation Without Representation

Origin\nThis meter reading takes place from 1741-1780. The author is Soame Jenyns who is a member of Parliament. Colonists atomic number 18 in the process of trying to profits independence and rebelling against Britain while Britain is in major debt from fighting the french and Indian War and the colonists are now refusing to pay taxes notwithstandinging though, from Britains perspective the colonists shouldnt be quetch since they payn less taxes than the Englishmen who live in the homeland.\n\nPurpose\nSoame Jenyns explains his viewpoint on the Colonists guide word No revenue without representation. The Colonists thrived under this slogan because they believed that since there werent whatever Colonists in Parliament that they werent being represent. However, from the British standpoint, the Colonists were considered to be Englishmen. Since they were Englishmen they were almost represented in Parliament. In the choice Soame is disproving the Colonists slogan and arguing and providing deduction on why its an hinder argument.\n\nValue\nThe author is argue Parliament and its decisions it makes. He non only disagrees with the slogan however totally shoots it down. The slogan that is know throughout history and renowned is basically being called utterly not true. He was a strong believer in realistic representation and didnt run into why the Colonists had such an make out with it. He didnt comprehend why the Colonists were trying to separate themselves and abandon they were British or from British decent. He mentioned how the cities of Manchester and Birmingham didnt send any representatives, but they were still virtually represented in Parliament. So, if virtual representation can locomotion over mountains and rivers, why couldnt it pass over the ocean and come to to America. Why did the Colonists put up a fight active it, but the homeland cities didnt even\nthough they had more to murmur about than the Colonists.\n\nLimitations\nWe are abandoned to the Colonists side o...